Skip to content
HinduClarity ज्ञान · Dharma · Practice

Corrections Policy

Last updated: August 1, 2026

Our commitment

HinduClarity aims to correct meaningful factual, attribution, quotation, translation, link, and contextual errors. Corrections are based on evidence, not simply on whether a reader agrees with a theological or interpretive position.

How to request a correction

Use the Contact page and write “Correction request” at the start of your message. Include:

  • The page title and URL
  • The exact sentence, image, caption, or claim at issue
  • Why you believe it is inaccurate or misleading
  • A reliable supporting source, preferably with a page, section, verse, or stable link
  • Your name and a reply address if you want a response

How requests are reviewed

We compare challenged material with appropriate primary and secondary sources, consider whether the issue reflects a factual error or a difference among traditions, and consult additional expertise when necessary. Complex questions involving translation, sectarian interpretation, history, medicine, or law may take longer to review.

Types of changes

  • Minor edit: spelling, grammar, formatting, or a broken link that does not alter meaning
  • Clarification: wording or context added to prevent a reasonable misunderstanding
  • Correction: a factual or attribution error is fixed
  • Substantive update: significant new material changes or expands the article
  • Retraction or removal: reserved for material that cannot be responsibly corrected, presents serious harm, or infringes rights

Correction notes

When a change materially affects the meaning or conclusion of a published page, a dated correction or update note explains what changed. Routine copy edits and formatting repairs generally do not require a public note.

Disagreements and appeals

If a request is declined, we may explain the decision where practical. A requester may submit additional reliable evidence for reconsideration. HinduClarity may preserve multiple well-supported interpretations rather than choosing one as universally authoritative.

Response expectations

Legitimate requests are reviewed within a reasonable period. Response times vary according to complexity and the evidence involved.